2024 Fall Investment Directions

Since our Midyear Investment Directions, economic data has remained resilient but shows signs of slowing growth. While wage growth was strong in August, the three-month average employment gain was the weakest since the pandemic, averaging +116,000 jobs per month.¹ To us, that shows clear evidence of a cooling labor market, but not one hurtling toward a recession. Our base case calls for U.S. growth to gradually slow but remain positive.

The Fed cut rates by 0.50% at its September meeting, initiating a cutting cycle 14 months after the last hike. We expect further rate cuts at the November and December meetings this year, but ultimately believe the market may be pricing in more rate cuts than will be delivered. The divergence of policy rates from expectations could have important near-term implications in fixed income and equity market performance.

Our main takeaway from the FOMC meeting was that the Fed will be proactive in their risk management approach and has room for further cuts if the data requires. With inflation moving towards the Fed’s 2% target, the Committee’s focus going forward will be more evenly distributed between labor markets and inflation. As a result, the pace of policy rate easing will be determined as much by employment and growth data as it is by inflation.

We believe the cutting cycle is the time to move out of cash and take advantage of higher rates before they drop meaningfully. Our analysis shows that fixed income markets have historically outperformed cash during rate cutting cycles (Figure 1). The Fed’s new focus on both sides of their dual mandate increases our conviction that intermediate duration fixed income can act as a diversifier to equities, if growth deteriorates from here.

Equity markets have also historically done well during cutting cycles, but performance has significantly lagged in rate cut cycles that end in recession.² While a recession is not our base case, some of the metrics that the National Bureau of Economic Research uses to determine the health of the economy are already beginning to moderate. This risks volatility ahead as markets become more sensitive to economic data, as was seen over the summer. Furthermore, we anticipate higher volatility tied to the U.S. election.

Figure 2: Asset class performance following previous Fed cuts

Timing and curve positioning are key in cutting cycles. We believe modestly extending duration to the belly of the curve early in the cutting cycle may be most rewarded. And yet, positioning data shows that investors continue to allocate to money market funds (MMF), with YTD inflows reaching new records.³ While history tells us MMF outflows typically do not occur until later in the Fed’s easing campaign, that same lookback shows that unwinding cash positions in favor of longer-dated fixed income allocations have tended to outperform when done earlier in the cycle.⁴ Any back up in yields could represent an opportunity for investors to move out on the curve and reduce an overweight allocation to cash.

We believe fiscal policy can continue to weigh on the long end of the yield curve, regardless of the election outcome. While the front end of the curve trades on monetary policy, the back end is more closely tethered to Treasury issuance, fiscal spending, and normalizing term premium — a slew of catalysts likely to keep longer rates more elevated as the curve continues to steepen. With government spending unlikely to slow regardless of the election’s outcome and U.S. debt already breaching new highs each month, there’s precedent for rapid rate fluctuations in the long end of the curve — an unfavorable risk-reward profile.

Our preferred duration is the 3-7 year ‘belly’ of the curve. While the current level of yields has fallen over the past few weeks, the exposure remains attractive. Consider that the belly is currently yielding more than the long bond averaged in the last 10 years.⁵ We like locking up yields at the start of the Fed’s easing cycle and look for any backup in rates as a buying opportunity. Additionally, the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index's (Agg) performance over the current Fed pause period has lagged the exposure’s historical average for previous pauses, and we think that underperformance likely hails from the factors impacting the long end of the curve — our preferred duration is the belly as those headwinds remain (Figure 4).

Stock-bond correlations are back in negative territory, adding to fixed income’s appeal. This was most clear in performance during the first week of September: as the S&P 500 sank 4% on labor market fears, the Agg posted positive returns and broke the months-long positive relationship.⁶ Look to the fixed income market as both a potential source of diversification and income, but the fluctuating nature of that relationship also has us considering other diversifiers (see Portfolio Considerations).

Given strong corporate fundamentals, we look to high yield bonds and structured credit to potentially add income to portfolios. Default rates remain below long-term averages but have ticked higher. High yield markets have been in negative net issuance and net leverage has come down across all ratings.⁷ Even as the Fed kicks off their easing campaign, we expect rates to remain in restrictive territory. Consequently, the importance of selectivity in high yield markets to screen for companies able to balance still-high rates amid slowing growth increases.

Our equity outlook acknowledges the likelihood of volatility in the coming months. More than anything, markets dislike uncertainty, and election years often provide plenty. Our analysis underscores that relationship — equity volatility historically tracks higher in the 90 days preceding elections than the 90 days following them.⁸ September and October have historically been the most negative months for U.S. equity performance, a seasonal trend that is only exaggerated in election years. And U.S. equities sit near all-time highs, accompanied by relatively rich valuations — a demanding setup for a challenging period.⁹

• For investors looking to manage volatility, we see opportunity for the tactical use of buffered strategies (see Election Spotlight), which track the return of a broad market up to an approximate upside limit, while seeking to maximize the downside protection against potential price declines.

We also see opportunity in volatility. We like using any near-term pullbacks to allocate to high quality companies across a range of styles and sectors trading at reasonable valuations. We expect that risk taking to be rewarded later in the year with greater clarity over the cutting cycle and resolution of election uncertainty providing additional tailwinds.

We maintain our preference for quality-style strategies, which have outperformed the market this year, but that spread has been accompanied by increasing concern over valuations.¹⁰ The richening in quality has been driven to a significant degree by the rising valuations of its technology-sector constituents. To date, technology’s higher multiple has been justified by its rapid earnings growth, but consensus estimates forecast the earnings growth rate to decelerate from here.

The yawning gap in earnings growth between technology and ‘the rest’ is set to narrow, an important catalyst to the broadening out trade that we expect to continue in 2025 (Figure 5). For this reason, we favor a sector-neutral approach to quality, seeking companies with quality attributes across sectors and industries rather than simply tilting more deeply towards technology. We would also supplement this core exposure to quality with selective allocations to industries and sectors that have not participated to the same degree in the market’s rally and have further room to run, while also looking to active strategies that adjust quickly amid a broader factor rotation.

A steepening yield curve with falling short rates should benefit exposures with value-tilts like financials, and lower rates and earnings growth can continue to benefit utilities.

• In addition to improving fundamentals, utilities have come into focus as a second-order beneficiary of the AI build out. So far this year, investment into data center construction has swelled — the dollar amount behind the buildout between January and July alone is nearly double the annual average amount over the last decade.¹¹ We think we are still in the early stages of this build and expect the historic capex cycle to continue to grow from here. Utilities have netted standout inflows so far this year on optimism for data center buildouts (and the corresponding upped electricity demand).¹² We remain constructive on the sector and think the rally can extend from here — higher demand, reasonable valuations, and lower rates are all likely to provide further tailwinds.

Financials can benefit from a steeper curve and lower short rates through improved net interest margins. We see opportunities to get more granular in the sector. We believe investment banks are particularly well-positioned, as lower financing rates should unlock the bottleneck in corporate actions like leverage buyouts and mergers. Broker-dealers may also be beneficiaries, as lower rates will support the already record pace of bond issuance, driving underwriting fees and volumes on trading desks.¹³ Finally, insurance companies screen especially well on quality and valuation (Figure 7).

From a portfolio perspective, the large outperformance of growth over value, and tech over the rest, may leave investors more heavily overweight growth and tech than they intended. Value currently represents its smallest weight in the S&P 500 in the last 25 years, and as such, rebalancing flows into the end of the year may provide a tailwind to value exposures.¹⁴ Investors who have been disappointed with value index returns over the last decade may be turning to proven value managers to get back to a more even value and growth split — the Morningstar Large Value ETF category has seen most H1 flows into active funds (59% vs. 41% index), a dramatic divergence from the growth ETF trend (93% of flows into index).¹⁵

Though July and early August saw elevated flows into small caps, we think this is a moment to consider reallocating from mega-cap to large-cap, rather than from large- to mid or small.¹⁶ Based on Fed forecasts for rates in their September Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), rates will remain close to 3% for the next two years, while economic growth will slow  from current levels. While high beta small caps can post sharp rallies on rapid shifting narratives, we do not believe that the earnings backdrop or rates at current levels can support sustained small cap performance.

Active management may provide a way to nimbly adjust exposures in an environment of greater uncertainty, lower liquidity and more frequent episodes of volatility. Aside from election-related uncertainty, the Fed's balance sheet has shrunk by over $1.8 trillion since beginning their runoff in 2022, reducing market liquidity and raising the prospect of more frequent severe spikes in volatility.¹⁷

History tells us that while tight elections are usually associated with increased volatility, broad market performance is unaffected by which party wins the White House. At the index level, staying invested has been more important than which party wins the presidency. Investors who held the course as political winds changed earned nearly double those who shifted their strategy based on the election in the last decade — a trend only magnified over the very long term (Figure 8).

President Biden’s exit from the election cycle resulted in a tightening of polls, and key battleground states remain hotly contested.¹⁸  While the two candidates have different policy ambitions spanning regulation, taxes, and trade, trading the election theme has become more difficult as the odds have narrowed.

Rather than tailoring a basket of favored exposures dependent on the election outcome, we prefer looking to common ground — beneficiaries of infrastructure and nearshoring investments stand out as two key opportunities:

• We think domestic infrastructure spending is likely to continue in 2025 and prefer investing in the theme rather than specific companies.
• We also look to domestic manufacturing and prefer tilting towards companies focused on U.S. and ‘friend-shored’ tech production and distribution, especially as markets grapple with tariffs and trade disruptions.

An additional bipartisan theme: neither candidate has exhibited an appetite for curbing the current U.S. budget deficit. Both tickets are either reluctant to cut fiscal spending or have proposed tax cuts leading to a decline in government revenues. From an investment lens, the long end of the yield curve is tantamount with U.S. debt and deficit spending. While governments often prefer to issue more long duration bonds when running a deficit, the U.S. has chosen instead to issue primarily short-term Treasuries, making navigating the fixed income markets more complex — and active management potentially more beneficial.

To read more about how investors could navigate market during election years, read our Outline for the Election Playbook (Part 1 | Part 2).

The next few months tee up a series of volatility (or at least, uncertainty) inducing events: questions about the magnitude and pace of domestic monetary policy adjustments, diverging policy abroad, expectations for a weaker Q3 reporting season, all capped with November’s election. We expect these catalysts to be drivers of sharp market reactions, and like looking beyond U.S. equities and bonds to help investors construct their portfolios.

Think globally

• For investors aiming to dial down U.S. beta, we like adding to international allocations. Equities abroad offer added diversification, especially given the relatively low tech sector concentration and inherent value tilt in developed ex-U.S. markets. International quality opportunities also trade at a discount — relative to both its own historical averages, and U.S. quality equities, while maintaining less exposure to global trade.¹⁹
• In emerging markets, we are constructive on single country exposures rather than broad allocations as regions contend with distinct inflation, growth, and policy backdrops. We’ve seen a divergence in EM policy decisions, with Brazil hiking rates while Indonesia’s central bank eased on the same day. Chile, for example, is likely to continue benefitting from its exposure to the copper industry (as evident in August’s strong mining exports) and its dovish central bank guidance — we maintain our overweight. For investors who do want broad allocations, we lean into emerging market ex-China exposures, as the country teeters towards deflation and manufacturing continues to contract.²⁰

Think beyond stocks and bonds

• While equity markets continue to flirt with new all-time highs, the risk-on rally comes at the same time as the price of gold — typically seen as a haven in periods of economic downturns — also cleared new levels.²¹ Gold’s advance likely hails from a handful of catalysts such as strong central bank buying and increased demand for hedges against escalating tensions in the Middle East. Both pull the price of gold higher all while further Fed cuts on the docket up the non-yielding asset’s attractiveness, especially as the 50 basis point cut in September is likely to steer significant capital from developed nations into the gold market. Notably, the price rally has been met with a dearth of flows into gold ETPs, and we think that trajectory can reverse as record central bank buying is unlikely to slow, and further price upside is paired with portfolio diversification benefits.²²

Keep taxes top of mind

• Near-term pullbacks also represent an opportunity for investors to harvest losses and redeploy into high conviction pockets of the market. August delivered a dose of volatility, and while the downturn proved to be short-lived, investors can sell exposures at a loss in future retreats and invest the proceeds in a correlated instrument — thereby locking in losses to offset a future capital gain, all while maintaining market exposure.