Flow & Tell with iShares | January 2023

ETF FLOWS IN JANUARY: IN THE MARKET FOR LOVE

January performance was unexpectedly strong, a much-welcomed bounce back following last year’s more-pain-than-gain mantra. Markets climbed, with all three major U.S. indices closing the month in the green. The Nasdaq Composite notched its best January performance since 20011 — though subsequent months’ performance was less-than-stellar that year as the tech bubble burst. Under the hood, January’s rally mostly rewarded 2022’s biggest losers, with low quality and high short interest names returning the most. The mood in the market may be more amorous heading into February and Valentine’s Day, but we remain cautious of bear market rallies and prefer pockets of U.S. equity markets that are priced for less-than-perfection ahead.

Elsewhere, international equities stepped into the spotlight last month as macro factors created broad-based demand for emerging market exposures. Investors prioritized liquidity in their fixed income strategies, and we watched flows and performance correlate somewhat inversely.

THEMES OF THE MONTH

Open to Love

Investors tapped China reopening tailwinds, and international equity ETFs emerged as the vehicle of choice.

Liquidity, Actually

Investors prioritized liquidity in their fixed income allocations, with the top ten asset gatherers in the fixed income ETF arena accounting for nearly half of average daily volume.

In Sickness and in Health

Flows and performance moved inversely as the month notched outflows for U.S. equities despite the market’s January rally.

JANUARY ETF FLOWS

January ETF heat map

January ETF flows compared with index performance

Scatter plot showing the relationship between index performance and ETF sub-asset class flows for January 2023.

Source: BlackRock, Bloomberg, chart by iShares Investment Strategy. As of January 30, 2023. Flows normalized by AUM as of December 31, 2022. Index performance is measured by the following indexes: EM Equity: MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index; Gold: ICE LBMA Gold Price Index; U.S. Treasury: ICE BofA 10-Year U.S. Treasury Index; Communication Services: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Communcation Services Sector Index; Utilities: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Utilities Sector Index; HY Credit: iBoxx USD High Yield Index; Commodities: S&P GSCI Index; Information Technology: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Information Technology Sector Index; Consumer Staples: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Consumer Staples Sector Index; Health Care: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Health Care Sector Index; Financials: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Financials Sector Index; Industrials: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Industrials Sectors Index; Energy: S&P 500 GICS Level 1 Energy Sectors Index. Coloring is based on quadrants: quadrant I: green; quadrant II: yellow; quadrant III: pink; quadrant IV: purple.

 

Index performance is for illustrative purposes only. Index performance does not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Chart description: Scatter plot showing the relationship between index performance and ETF sub-asset class flows for January 2023. Chart shows some sub-asset classes, such Consumer Staples and Utilities having positive ETF flows but negative index performance. Other sectors, like Health Care, saw both negative index performance and outflows in January. On other hand, Em Equities and Real Estate sectors saw both positive ETF flows and index performance.


OPEN TO LOVE

China’s swift reopening after three years of strict zero-Covid controls spurred emerging market (EM) optimism in January, propelling standout flows as investors reallocated overseas. Several favorable inflation reports and a peaking U.S. dollar also added tailwinds to reverse last year’s volatility-induced slide.

Emerging market equities captured $8.9 billion in inflows in January, accounting for over 44% of net equity inflows on the year (compared to under 8% in 2022).2 EM sovereign debt ETF flows followed a similar trajectory, fetching $2.2 billion in January — its largest month of inflows since 2018.3 These strong flows underscore a sentiment shift in the new year after 2022’s poor performance on the heels of tightening monetary policy and a surging USD, prompting investors to up their allocations from last year’s underweight positioning in a return to benchmark. Further, strong flows to single country funds point to tactical positioning in precision products, suggesting strong demand from both strategic allocators and fast money traders.

Emerging markets were not the only exposures feeling the reopening love — investors also turned to global strategies to tap tailwinds from easing Covid restrictions. January delivered $7.4 billion in inflows to developed markets ex-U.S. equities, its most positive month since January 2022.4 Certain commodities also notched inflows as the world’s largest raw material consumer returned online: natural gas and metal ETFs both touted positive flows in January.5

Contribution to total equity flows

Bar chart depicting percentage breakdown of ETF flows across emerging markets, developed markets, developed markets excluding the U.S., and blended.

Source: BlackRock, Bloomberg, Markit, chart by iShares Investment Strategy. ETF groupings determined by BlackRock, Markit. MSCI China represented by the MSCI China Index, rebased to 100 as of December 31, 2019. As of January 31, 2023.

 

Index performance is for illustrative purposes only. Index performance does not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Chart description: Bar chart depicting percentage breakdown of ETF flows across emerging markets, developed markets, developed markets excluding the U.S., and blended. The bar chart displays a significant increase in flows to emerging markets starting in January 2023, in line with increased performance with the MSCI China Index.


LIQUIDITY, ACTUALLY

While last year’s nearly $200 billion in fixed income ETFs inflows set a record, 2023 is also off to a hot start.6 The strong consensus view that investors should top up their fixed income allocations at attractive yields translated to $23.2 billion in net inflows in January.7 Investment grade corporate credit ETFs sat atop the fixed income table, gathering $9.1 billion in net assets as investors look to deploy capital towards opportunities within the asset class.8

But what stands out about fixed income ETF flows this year is the preference for liquidity, regardless of exposure. While there are 582 fixed income ETFs listed in the U.S., the top 10 asset-gatherers in January represented nearly half of average daily trading volumes. The preference for liquidity was more consistent than preference for exposure, as we saw demand for emerging market debt, investment grade and high yield corporate credit, mortgage-back securities, broad-market debt, and U.S. treasury ETFs. This trend is favored by institutional investors, who often gravitate toward best-in-class liquidity to deliver nimble and tactical plays. In other words, investors see numerous opportunities within bonds and are turning towards the liquidity of ETFs as they make their portfolio allocation decisions.

Top fixed income ETF asset gatherers

Bar chart depicting top fixed income ETF asset gatherers, comparing January ETF flows and ETF volume.

Source: BlackRock, Bloomberg, chart by iShares Investment Strategy. ‘ETF flows’ the total net flows over the course of January 2023. ‘ETF volume’ calculated as the average daily volume of each ETF divided by the total average daily volume of all U.S.-domiciled fixed income ETFs. As of January 31, 2023.

Chart Description: Bar chart depicting top fixed income ETF asset gatherers, comparing January ETF flows and ETF volume. The chart shows flows beating volume for all categories except U.S. high yield fixed income.


IN SICKNESS AND IN HEALTH

In the ETF landscape, we often ask ourselves whether flows precede or follow performance. Where it gets interesting is when flows and performance aren’t the perfect match. For instance, despite the S&P 500 ending 18% lower in 2022, U.S.-focused equity ETFs added $314.5 billion.9 On the other hand, the start of 2023 saw U.S. equity ETFs shed $657 million in January, despite strong performance as markets rallied to finish the month in the green.10 This puzzling flow-performance dichotomy can in part be traced to a popular ETF use case: tax loss harvesting, a strategy utilized in down years as investors sell assets in the red to lock in losses, and reinvest proceeds elsewhere. Large outflows from U.S. equities in January were partially a byproduct of large inflows in December, as tax-related trades were mechanically unwound.

Within fixed income, investors poured into U.S. Treasury ETFs across the duration spectrum in 2022 even though performance for the year was negative across the curve. More distinctly, long-term U.S. Treasury ETFs added $22.6 billion in assets despite the long end of the curve not offering much in the relationship, falling over 30% on the year.11 But that link looks to have righted itself to start the new year: performance year-to-date is positive, and investors continue to add to long-term U.S. Treasury ETFs to the tune of $2.4 billion (the most across duration buckets).12

U.S. equity love-hate relationship

Bar chart displaying monthly flow z-scores dating from January 2020 to January 2023, showing negative z-scores in January 2023.

Source: BlackRock, Bloomberg, Markit, chart by iShares Investment Strategy. ETF groupings determined by BlackRock, Markit. ETF flow z-score calculation based on the monthly ETF flows during a 5-year lookback period. S&P 500 represented by the S&P 500 Total Return Index monthly total return. As of January 31, 2023.

 

Index performance is for illustrative purposes only. Index performance does not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Chart description: Bar chart displaying monthly flow z-scores dating from January 2020 to January 2023, showing negative z-scores in January 2023. The bar chart is overlaid with the S&P 500 total returns, showing unrelated correlation between the two factors.


Kristy Akullian

Kristy Akullian

Senior member of the iShares Investment Strategy team

Robert Young

Markets Coverage

Contributor

Michael Malof

Markets Coverage

Contributor

Jon Angel

Investment Strategy

Contributor

Faye Witherall

Investment Strategy

Contributor

Nick Morales

Investment Strategy

Contributor